TRADUguide

TRADUguide - Your Guide to Translators and Translation Agencies

For translators

Find a job  |   Conges terminology center  |   Agencies list  |   Feedback forum
Register as a freelance translator or an agency  |   My profile  |   My status
Become a featured member  |   Renew your featured membership

For job posters

Post a translation job to ask for quotes
Browse the translators directory
My account / My job postings

Home   |   This is how TRADUguide works   |   Contacts / Imprint

 

TRADUguide.com auf Deutsch

Conges terminology question

<<Previous question

All questions

Next question>>

226 months ago

Professional linguist  See profile asked this question:

Language pair:

English > French

Subject:

Technical / Engineering

Level of diffculty:

Easy / medium

Word or term in question:

and the forward element power

Context:

and the forward element power

Keywords:

electricity

 

 

Important If you feel that you can answer the above terminology question, you are invited to enter your answer.

(Login required)

(Asker only)

Answers on this question

226 months ago

  See my profile wrote:

la commande de marche avant

My comment:

peut-être par opposition à la commande de marche arrière (reverse)

Click here to comment on this answer (login required)

(Asker only)

226 months ago

  See my profile wrote:

(Asker only)

226 months ago

  See my profile wrote:

(Asker only)

226 months ago

  See my profile wrote:

???

My comment:

We need some more context to understand (elememnt power or power element?)

Click here to comment on this answer (login required)

(Asker only)

226 months ago

Claude Le Frapper  See my profile wrote:

et l’élément avant devrait avoir IO x la

My comment:

et l’élément avant devrait avoir IO x la puissance de l’élément arrière
Think of the x as 'times' like in a multiplication.
Also, avant et arrière could be replaced by direct et inverse in some context.
The English doesn't seem to be written correctly, is that a manual for a Far Eastern import?

Click here to comment on this answer (login required)

(Asker only)

226 months ago

Claude Le Frapper  See my profile wrote:

et l’élément avant devrait avoir IO x la

My comment:

et l’élément avant devrait avoir IO x la puissance de l’élément arrière
Think of the x as 'times' like in a multiplication.
Also, avant et arrière could be replaced by direct et inverse in some context.
The English doesn't seem to be written correctly, is that a manual for a Far Eastern import?

Click here to comment on this answer (login required)

Comments by other colleagues on this answer:

226 months ago

myrthe  See profile wrote:

Agree. It's what I thought! 10 fois la puissance...

(Asker only)