TRADUguide - Your Guide to Translators and Translation Agencies

229 months ago

Barbara Cochran (a guest user) asked this question:

This question has already been answered and rated. Therefore, no new answers can be given.

229 months ago

Prabir Mudaliar   wrote:

an incidental/secondary advantage

My comment:

Let's forget 'gibberish'.
The fact still remains we are here to assist the asker.
Could 'concene' be a typo for 'concerne'? Will it still make any sense?
Like all the others, I am still befuddled.
But my answer is the best I can offer.

229 months ago

Prabir Mudaliar   wrote:

if this doesn't apply to you - forget about it

My comment:

Again - just a suggestion
This person probably uses MSN too much

The asker rated this answer best

229 months ago

Prabir Mudaliar   wrote:

not so much involved

229 months ago

Prabir Mudaliar   wrote:

Bien vu Barbara! il me semble bien qu'il s'agit d'un "typo"!

My comment:

Le premier mot pourrait bien etre "concerne" et le deuxieme n`a pas de sens(a moins qu'il veut dire "trop"! De toutes les manieres, si les mots, qui sont entre parentheses" n`ajoutent rien au sens general de la phrase, tu peux tout simplement les ignorer et ne pas les reprendre (carrement) dans le texte Anglais! ou bien, par mesure de precaution, tu peux juste reprendre les parentheses et ecrire "not clear".

Comments by other colleagues on this answer:

229 months ago

   wrote:

I think I agree with Mabrouk's thoughts on the problem and the strategy proposed. Sounds like someone's comment on the text and could very well be 'pas concerne trop'. I'd leave it out.

229 months ago

Jennifer White   wrote:

So would I. I agree entirely with Mabrouk. Surely it is not your job to decipher gibberish? I wouldn't waste any time on it.

The asker rated this answer best