TRADUguide

TRADUguide - Your Guide to Translators and Translation Agencies

For translators

Find a job  |   Conges terminology center  |   Agencies list  |   Feedback forum
Register as a freelance translator or an agency  |   My profile  |   My status
Become a featured member  |   Renew your featured membership

For job posters

Post a translation job to ask for quotes
Browse the translators directory
My account / My job postings

Home   |   This is how TRADUguide works   |   Contacts / Imprint

 

TRADUguide.com auf Deutsch

Conges terminology question

<<Previous question

All questions

Next question>>

216 months ago

Traduli  See profile asked this question:

Language pair:

German > English

Subject:

Law / Certificates

Level of diffculty:

Difficult / demanding

Word or term in question:

auseinander fallen

Context:

Kontext: Rechtsstreit um einen Lizenzvertrag

In einer solchen Situation, in der das wirtschaftliche Interesse und die Rechtsinhaberschaft *auseinanderfallen* (= nicht bei einer einzigen Partei liegen), handelt es sich um einen typischen Fall, in dem der Partei mit dem wirtschaftlichen Interesse die Möglichkeit einzuräumen ist, die Ansprüche im eigenen Namen geltend zu machen.

 

Want to send the asker a comment? Click here.

Important This question has already been answered and rated. Therefore, no new answers can be given.

Complete list of answers and comments

216 months ago

  See profile wrote:

to be seperated

216 months ago

Aharon303  See profile wrote:

diverging interests

216 months ago

HanoverConsulting  See profile wrote:

are in conflict with each other

My comment:

This is a technical term indicating that the scientific intresets and the interests of the legal entity are not congruent. In American jurisprudence, the translation is: "conflict with one another" and it's a term of art.

My references:

I'm a lawyer.

The asker rated this answer best

216 months ago

www.buero-garisch.de  See profile wrote:

here: (don't) lie with one person/party only

My comment:

= rest with more than just one person/party

216 months ago

PNMunich  See profile wrote:

differ

Comments by other colleagues on this answer:

216 months ago

Rupert Kindermann  See profile wrote:

I think this is right on the mark