TRADUguide - Your Guide to Translators and Translation Agencies

254 months ago

Kevin Lovelady   asked this question:

This question has already been answered and rated. Therefore, no new answers can be given.

253 months ago

   wrote:

I don't know how...

My comment:

other answerers can sound so sure that this is human food being tested! From where, exactly, in the small amount of context given, does this idea come - all it says is 'aliments' - a fairly broad term. It would be a total waste of time testing most human food on dogs - I can tell you as a dog owner that most dogs don't turn their noses up at much that was meant for humans. Now dog food, that's another matter! Surely from your context you must know what these 'aliments' are!

The asker rated this answer best

254 months ago

   wrote:

To have dogs taste test the food

My comment:

The whole concept is kind of gross, but not so much so if they are taste testing it for other dogs/animals. Should they be taste-testing for human consumption, then it would be a little disgusting.

Comments by other colleagues on this answer:

253 months ago

   wrote:

I think you are right.

254 months ago

   wrote:

To have dog-tested food finally approved

254 months ago

lana   wrote:

Animal-tested food

254 months ago

lana   wrote:

or...to have human food tasted by dogs and validated (approved) accordingly

Comments by other colleagues on this answer:

254 months ago

Jennifer White   wrote:

Yes, I'd use this too.

254 months ago

Jennifer White   wrote:

Yes, I'd use this too.

254 months ago

lana   wrote:

to have human food tested by dogs and validated (approved) accordingly